Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Counters Sponsorship
Sponsored by
Making luxury bathrooms affordable.
Click here to visit our virtual showroom.
 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

My Word - 25 April 2008



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

I AM pleased to say that this column has now become very 'interactive' over the past few weeks.
Simply log onto our website, find 'My Word', and have your say. Last week's column attracted around 50 comments from members of the public, which is fantastic. Another great way to have your say over the issues of the week. You won't always agree with them, but you can reply. Please note if you post a comment deemed unsuitable, it will be removed. Be sensible, have your say, and then there's no problem.

NEXT Thursday is local elections day, a very important occasion for the town but one which, no doubt, will be ignored by a large section of people entitled to vote. Early indications are the turnout could be as low as 25 per cent, which is shocking. The people elected will be making key decisions affecting Hastings and St Leonards. People tend to moan about various subjects - be it wheelie bins, dog mess, council tax or whatever - now is the chance to have your vote. If you waste your vote, don't then moan. My guess is that, once again, it will all be very tight, and that is a problem that Hastings has suffered from in recent years. No one party really dominates the political scene, and the balance of power tends to swing from one party to another, or indeed no overall power at all for any one party. That only leads to very little being done. That has certainly been the case in the past. What will happen next Thursday? There is no doubt that Labour are very unpopular nationally - and they deserve to be. Post Office closures have been bad news, Brown has hardly been a hit with the public, and the abolition of the 10 pence tax rate from April 1 is a dead cert disaster for them. It would therefore follow that Labour will struggle next week. That may be the case, but don't count on it. The Tories have hardly impressed with their handling of the borough council over the past two years - pretty average I would say. The LibDems don't appear to be making much of an impact, although Margaret Williams may give Peter Pragnell a good run in the Conquest ward. And then we have the BNP who are contesting four seats - some may well be surprised at the number of votes they pick up. My prediction - the Tories will retain overall control.

I SAID last week that our MP Michael Foster has become somewhat agitated in recent weeks, and he admits that, times are tough for him and Labour. The latest furore - the abolition of the 10 pence tax rate - is, of course, self-inflicted and indeed was announced by Gordon Brown when he was Chancellor. Wednesday's climbdown was very embarrassing. Michael knows only too well that he must soon start making crucial decisions, or he will risk being dumped by his electorate at the next general election. On the issue of Post Offices, he fought to save them locally, but hey this was a government policy, so its okay opposing them, but then perhaps he should have stood up against his party and voted against the closures in Parliament.
Now we have the 10 pence tax rate abolition. Michael says it is wrong, and changes must be made, which it now looks like there will be, but on this Michael I think the people are looking to you to oppose it and say, no Gordon this is not good enough. Michael, you have been warned, the public are on your case and they want a clear message from you.
Words are fine, action is what will save you your seat.

The full article contains 625 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2008 12:18 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hastings
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Fidel,

25/04/2008 09:16:17
"Last week's column attracted around 50 comments from members of the public" - Unfortunately they were mainly from the same person posting under different names.
2

MAXINE OUT,

25/04/2008 09:53:33
Fidel you're right! You really do need to get some sort of life Maxine!
3

Darryl,

Hastings 25/04/2008 11:27:03
Following Michael Foster’s condemnation of the 10% tax banding withdrwal , I confess I’m somewhat perplexed.

There were , a number of Labour Rebels , led By Frank Field , who tabled a Finace Bill amendment which demanded that ministers take measures to “ensure that no person is worse off”. According to the signatories released to the national press….. our MP’s was not a signatory.

Michael has a choice ….representing his constituents ; or Gordon Brown !
4

MAXINE OUT,

25/04/2008 12:20:53
'Darryl' Enough already about your petty vendetta against Michael. This website has been exposed as a scam against the Labour Party.
What we really want to know is how involved in the plot are you with the person posting ad nauseum as "Bart Simpson/parker/O M Riley/FOSTER OUT/Maxine. I have no proof but your constant aggreement with her various personas and ill though out views suggest you were part to it.
5

Googling,

25/04/2008 12:22:01
surely the goal of Michael's actions was to ensure that all those losing out as a result of the tax changes are compensated?

He was clearly against anyone losing out and thanks to pressure brought by him and a host of other backbenchers solutions are now being put into motion.

Surely that is what is right for low earners in Hastings and Rye?

the amendment has now been withdrawn anyway but if the Government was to lose a budget vote it could trigger a general election and a new tory administration could then be inpower. despite all their rhetoric no can actually believe they give two hoots for the worst off in society can they?
6

MAXINE OUT,

25/04/2008 12:29:06
'Darryl' Enough already about your petty vendetta against Michael. This website has been exposed as a scam against the Labour Party.
What we really want to know is how involved in the plot are you with the person posting ad nauseum as "Bart Simpson/parker/O M Riley/FOSTER OUT/Maxine. I have no proof but your constant aggreement with her various personas and ill though out views suggest you were party to it.
7

Darryl,

Hastings 25/04/2008 13:09:52
There is no connection between the other people and myself.

Yes I belive we need a change of MP ..but that is democracy !

Todays opinion polls show that the Tories have their biggest lead nationally for 20 years. Are you saying Maxine, that all these voters have a vendetta against Labour ? Doesn't it tell you anything ?

There is no political bias to this site as set out in the Observer's pledge.

Googling ..the point I was making that the government's change of heart was due to the campaign , by Frank Field , not backed by our MP. Without that campaign there would have been no concessions. Even on the score of concessions ..they are not immediate and many will lose out.

But it is good to have some good constructive debate ..thats what this site is about !


8

Googling,

25/04/2008 15:27:47
darryl

there was a much wider campaign than purely that by frank field. There was pressure being brought to bear from a great many back benchers that purely the 45 or so who signed the motion. I believe our MP has quite clearly expressed his view on this - i.e the need to compensate those who lost out and that outcome has now been secured.

You say the affects will not be immediate - you are right but they will be backdated which means people will be fully compensated.

i would also make that all the running on this issue was effectively made by the labour party. Frank field is labour. Angela smith was a Labour PPS threatening to resing and it was the anger of the labour backbenchers that brought about change.

the tory view on this matter was totally opportunistic. they do not care about helpin the not so well off. reinstate the 10p band? fine but by rejecting the budget they would also have rejected increased winter fuel payments, the uprating of the tax allowance, pension credit and tax credit increases and the base rate reduction to 20p. these changes are already benefitting millions and i do not believe hitting them to score a political point would have been good for anyone
9

parker,

25/04/2008 16:26:52
There are some peculiar people posting on this website, accusing me of being, Darryl, Foster out and O.reily and Bart Simpson. As I work full time I fail to see how this would be possible. I suggest that the person posting as Fidel is obviously confused.
For the record I that New Labour is the most attrocious government we have ever had.Hopefully on May 1st they will be voted out
10

parker,

25/04/2008 16:58:47
Darryl just ignore these nu labour undemocratic people. Most right minded people don't wish to vote for new labour.
As Foster and co are so good at spinning, they will probably pull out all the stops to discredit any one who disagrees with their views.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you agree with the description that St Leonards is 'like London's most creative arts district?'
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.